Author List: Qiu, Liangfei; Rui, Huaxia; Whinston, Andrew B.;
Journal of Management Information Systems, 2014, Volume 30, Issue 4, Page 235-268.
This paper examines the effect of a social network on prediction markets using a controlled laboratory experiment that allows us to identify causal relationships between a social network and the performance of an individual participant, as well as the performance of the prediction market as a whole. Through a randomized experiment, we first confirm the theoretical predictions that participants with more social connections are less likely to invest in information acquisition from outside information sources, but perform significantly better than other participants in prediction markets. We further show that when the cost of information acquisition is low, a social network-embedded prediction market outperforms a nonnetworked prediction market. We find strong support for peer effects in prediction accuracy among participants. These results have direct managerial implications for the business practice of prediction markets and are critical to understanding how to use social networks to improve the performance of prediction markets.
Keywords: information exchange;prediction markets;social networks
Algorithm:

List of Topics

#177 0.197 decision accuracy aid aids prediction experiment effects accurate support making preferences interaction judgment hybrid perceptual strategy account context restrictiveness taking
#234 0.136 social networks influence presence interactions network media networking diffusion implications individuals people results exchange paper sites evidence self-disclosure important examine
#30 0.109 market trading markets exchange traders trade transaction financial orders securities significant established number exchanges regulatory structures order traditional stock provides
#249 0.105 network networks social analysis ties structure p2p exchange externalities individual impact peer-to-peer structural growth centrality participants sharing economic ownership embeddedness
#93 0.101 performance results study impact research influence effects data higher efficiency effect significantly findings impacts empirical significant suggest outcomes better positive
#51 0.093 results study research experiment experiments influence implications conducted laboratory field different indicate impact effectiveness future participants evidence test controlled involving