Author List: Ji, Yonghua; Mookerjee, Vijay S.; Radhakrishnan, Suresh;
Information Systems Research, 2011, Volume 22, Issue 1, Page 5/21/2017.
Software product versioning (i.e., upgrading the product after its initial release) is a widely adopted practice followed by leading software providers such as Microsoft, Oracle, and IBM. Unlike conventional durable goods, software products are relatively easy to upgrade, making upgrades a strategic consideration in commercial software production. We consider a two-period model with a monopoly software provider who develops and releases a software product to the market. Unlike previous research, we consider demand variability and endogeneity to determine the functionality of the software in the first and second periods. Demand endogeneity is the impact of the word-of-mouth effect that positively relates the features in the initial release of the product to its demand in the second period. We also determine the design effort that should be spent in the first period to prepare for upgrading the product in the second period—upgrade design effort—to tap into the possible future demand. Results show that the upgrade design effort can be lower or higher when there is more market demand uncertainty. We also show that the features of the product in its initial release and upgrade design effort can be complements as well as substitutes, depending on the strength of the word-of-mouth effect. The results in this paper provide insights into how demand-side factors (market demand variability or demand endogeneity) can influence supply-side decisions (initial features and upgrade design effort). A key insight of the analysis is that a high word-of-mouth effect helps manage the product in the face of demand variability.
Keywords: software upgrades;demand endogeneity;upgrade design effort;demand variability;upgrade strategy
Algorithm:

List of Topics

#260 0.412 policy movie demand features region effort second threshold release paid number regions analyze period respect availability released lower effect results
#5 0.157 consumer consumers model optimal welfare price market pricing equilibrium surplus different higher results strategy quality cost lower competition firm paper
#232 0.140 software development product functionality period upgrade sampling examines extent suggests factors considered useful uncertainty previous called complementarities greater cost present
#89 0.131 product products quality used characteristics examines role provide goods customization provides offer core sell key potential stronger insights design initial
#270 0.058 design designs science principles research designers supporting forms provide designing improving address case little space criteria methods increasing synthesis designer