Author List: Lee, Jong Seok; Keil, Mark; Kasi, Vijay;
Journal of Management Information Systems, 2012, Volume 29, Issue 1, Page 53-78.
Software project escalation is a costly problem that leads to significant financial losses. Prior research suggests that setting a publicly announced limit on resources can make individuals less willing to escalate their commitment to a failing course of action. However, the relationship between initial budget and schedule goals and software project escalation remains unexplored. Drawing on goal setting theory as well as sunk cost and mental budgeting perspectives, we explore the effect of goal difficulty and goal specificity on software project escalation. The findings from a laboratory experiment with 349 information technology professionals suggest that both very difficult and very specific goals for budget and schedule can limit software project escalation. Further, the level of commitment to a budget and schedule goal directly affects software project escalation and also interacts with goal difficulty and goal specificity to affect software project escalation. This study makes a theoretical contribution to the existing body of knowledge on software project management by establishing a connection between goal setting theory and software project escalation. The study also contributes to practice by highlighting the potential negative consequences that can result from the nature of initial budget and schedule goals that are established at the outset of a project.
Keywords: escalation of commitment; goal setting theory; mental budgeting; project estimation; software project escalation; software project management; sunk cost
Algorithm:

List of Topics

#139 0.498 project projects failure software commitment escalation cost factors study problem resources continue prior escalate overruns taken failing troubled sunk fail
#204 0.157 goals goal research setting achieve accounting behavior multiple meet make constraints differing ability particularly association set single conflicting promotes and/or
#173 0.081 effect impact affect results positive effects direct findings influence important positively model data suggest test factors negative affects significant relationship
#227 0.073 commitment need practitioners studies potential role consider difficult models result importance influence researchers established conduct investigated establishing appear clearly determining
#110 0.064 theory theories theoretical paper new understanding work practical explain empirical contribution phenomenon literature second implications different building based insights need