Author List: Fuller, Mark A.; HARDIN, ANDREW M.; Davison, Robert M.;
Journal of Management Information Systems, 2006, Volume 23, Issue 3, Page 209-235.
The concept of collective efficacy within virtual teams has yet to be studied. This study developed and rigorously validated a domain-specific measure of collective efficacy, entitled virtual team efficacy, within a comprehensive research framework. Over a two-year period we collected field study data from multiple samples of information systems project teams--in all, 52 virtual teams comprising 318 students from the United States, Great Britain, and Hong Kong. As we hypothesized, group potency and computer collective efficacy act as antecedents to virtual team efficacy, and virtual team efficacy is in turn predictive of perceptual and objective measures of performance. Further, consistent with efficacy theory, we also find that virtual team efficacy acts on performance outcomes through specific mediating processes. This paper contributes to the academic and practitioner communities by providing a comprehensive model of virtual team efficacy and performance and by providing validated instrumentation that can be immediately applied during further research in this area.
Keywords: collective efficacy;global virtual teams;virtual team efficacy;virtual teams
Algorithm:

List of Topics

#87 0.245 team teams virtual members communication distributed performance global role task cognition develop technology involved time individual's affects project geographically individuals
#265 0.196 collaborative groups feedback group work collective individuals higher effects efficacy perceived tasks members environment writing experiment did task intelligence compared
#124 0.124 validity reliability measure constructs construct study research measures used scale development nomological scales instrument measurement researchers developed validation discriminant results
#125 0.109 framework model used conceptual proposed given particular general concept frameworks literature developed develop providing paper developing guidelines concepts appropriate set
#108 0.082 model research data results study using theoretical influence findings theory support implications test collected tested based empirical empirically context paper
#169 0.081 research journals journal information systems articles academic published business mis faculty discipline analysis publication management tenure authors publications disciplines years
#28 0.078 cultural culture differences cross-cultural states united status national cultures japanese studies japan influence comparison versus china participants country singapore diverse