Author List: Thatcher, Matt E.; Clemons, Eric K.;
Journal of Management Information Systems, 2000, Volume 17, Issue 2, Page 29-57.
Advances in genetic testing and data mining technologies have increased the availability of genetic information to insurance companies and insureds (applicants and policy holders) in the individual health insurance market (IHIM). Regulators, concerned that insurance companies will use this information to discriminate against applicants who have a genetic risk factor but who are still healthy, have implemented genetic privacy legislation in at least 18 states. However, in previous work we have demonstrated that such legislation will have unintended consequences--it will reduce consumer participation in the market without making those remaining better off. This paper identifies a mechanism, a pure bundling strategy, that insurance companies may implement in this regulatory environment to restore (or maximize) consumer participation in the market and to discourage such discrimination among insureds. This problem is examined through System Dynamics, a simulation-based modeling technique. The results will have significant implications for policy designs implemented by insurance companies, and for legislation implemented by industry regulators, and therefore, for the insurability of the individuals that rely on this market for health insurance coverage.
Keywords: bundling; information privacy; insurance markets; insurance policy; privacy; privacy cost
Algorithm:

List of Topics

#223 0.353 insurance companies growth portfolios intensity company life portfolio industry newly vulnerable terms composition operating implemented factors asset focus disaggregation choices
#239 0.189 privacy information concerns individuals personal disclosure protection concern consumers practices control data private calculus regulation risk individual legislation government sensitive
#5 0.125 consumer consumers model optimal welfare price market pricing equilibrium surplus different higher results strategy quality cost lower competition firm paper
#171 0.072 markets industry market ess middle integrated logistics increased demand components economics suggested emerging preference goods interesting form recent vertically chinese