Author List: Garg, Rajiv; Telang, Rahul;
MIS Quarterly, 2013, Volume 37, Issue 4, Page 1253-1264.
With an abundance of products available online, many online retailers provide sales rankings to make it easier for consumers to find the best-selling products. Successfully implementing product rankings online was done a decade ago by Amazon, and more recently by Apple's App Store. However, neither market provides actual download data, a very useful statistic for both practitioners and researchers. In the past, researchers developed various strategies that allowed them to infer demand from rank data. Almost all of that work is based on an experiment that shifts sales or collaboration with a vendor to get actual sales data. In this research, we present an innovative method to use public data to infer the rank-demand relationship for the paid apps on Apple's iTunes App Store. We find that the top-ranked paid app for iPhone generates 150 times more downloads compared to the paid app ranked at 200. Similarly, the top paid app on iPad generates 120 times more downloads compared to the paid app ranked at 200. We conclude with a discussion on an extension of this framework to the Android platform, in-app purchases, and free apps.
Keywords: Android; app downloads; app store; Apple iTunes; in-app purchase; Mobile apps; pareto distribution; sales-rank calibration
Algorithm:

List of Topics

#107 0.430 app brand mobile apps paid utility facebook use consumption users brands effects activities categories patterns controls extension store positive factor
#118 0.136 online consumers consumer product purchase shopping e-commerce products commerce website electronic results study behavior experience b2c impact internet purchases websites
#23 0.104 channel distribution demand channels sales products long travel tail new multichannel available product implications strategy allows internet revenue technologies times
#6 0.103 data used develop multiple approaches collection based research classes aspect single literature profiles means crowd collected trend accuracy databases accurate
#222 0.087 research researchers framework future information systems important present agenda identify areas provide understanding contributions using literature studies paper potential review