Author List: Li, Xinxin; Hitt, Lorin M.;
MIS Quarterly, 2010, Volume 34, Issue 4, Page 809-A5.
Consumer reviews may reflect not only perceived quality but also the difference between quality and price perceived value). In markets where product prices change frequently, these price-influenced reviews may be biased as a signal of product quality when used by consumers possessing no knowledge of historical prices. In this paper, we develop an analytical model that examines the impact of price-influenced reviews on firm optimal pricing and consumer welfare. We quantify the price effects in consumer reviews for different formats of review systems using actual market prices and online consumer ratings data collected for the digital camera market. Our empirical results suggest that unidimensional ratings, commonly used in most review systems, can be substantially biased by price effects. In fact, unidimensional ratings are more closely correlated with ratings of product value than ratings of product quality. Our findings suggest the importance for firms to account for these price effects in their overall marketing strategy and suggest that review systems could better serve consumers by explicitly expanding review dimensions to separate perceived value and perceived quality.
Keywords: empirical analysis; online product reviews; optimal pricing; price effects; review bias
Algorithm:

List of Topics

#199 0.299 reviews product online review products wom consumers consumer ratings sales word-of-mouth impact reviewers word using effect marketing helpfulness electronic commerce
#5 0.161 consumer consumers model optimal welfare price market pricing equilibrium surplus different higher results strategy quality cost lower competition firm paper
#41 0.127 price prices dispersion spot buying good transaction forward retailers commodity pricing collected premium customers using posted relatively obtain listing uncertainty
#115 0.123 quality different servqual service high-quality difference used quantity importance use measure framework impact assurance better include means van dimensions assessing
#285 0.065 effects effect research data studies empirical information literature different interaction analysis implications findings results important set large provide using paper