Author List: Carte, Traci A.; Russell, Craig J.;
MIS Quarterly, 2003, Volume 27, Issue 3, Page 479-501.
One result of the increasing sophistication and complexity of MIS theory and research is the number of studies hypothesizing and testing for moderation effects. A review of the MIS and broader management literatures suggests researchers investigating moderated relationships often commit one or more errors falling into three broad categories: inappropriate use or interpretation of statistics, misalignment of research design with phenomena of interest, and measurement or scaling issues. Examples of nine common errors are presented. Commission of these errors is expected to yield literatures characterized by mixed results at best, and thoroughly erroneous results at worse. Procedures representing examples of best practice and reporting guidelines are provided to help MIS investigators avoid or minimize these errors.
Keywords: contingency models; PLS; Tests of moderation
Algorithm:

List of Topics

#96 0.214 errors error construction testing spreadsheet recovery phase spreadsheets number failures inspection better studies modules rate replicated detection correction optimal discovering
#11 0.177 structural pls measurement modeling equation research formative squares partial using indicators constructs construct statistical models researchers latent analysis results sem
#292 0.139 information research literature systems framework review paper theoretical based potential future implications practice discussed current concept propositions findings provided extant
#121 0.132 human awareness conditions point access humans images accountability situational violations result reduce moderation gain people features presence increase uses means
#25 0.100 relationships relationship relational information interfirm level exchange relations perspective model paper interpersonal expertise theory study effects literature role social identify
#255 0.079 mis management article resources sciences developing organization future recommendations procedures informing organizational assessment professional groups area improving conference evaluate activity