Author List: Venkatesh, Viswanath; Morris, Michael G.;
MIS Quarterly, 2000, Volume 24, Issue 1, Page 115-139.
Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this research investigated gender differences in the overlooked context of individual adoption and sustained usage of technology in the workplace. User reactions and technology usage behavior were studied over a five-month period among 342 workers being introduced to a new software system. At all three points of measurement, compared to women, men's technology usage decisions were more strongly influenced by their perceptions of usefulness. In contrast, women were more strongly influenced by perceptions of ease of use and subjective norm, although the effect of subjective norm diminished over time. These findings were robust even after statistically controlling for key confounding variables identified in prior organizational behavior research (i.e., income, occupation, and education levels), and another possible confound from technology research, prior experience with computers in general. Thus, in addition to identifying key boundary conditions in the role of the original TAM constructs (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use), this research provides the basis for the integration of subjective norm into the model. In light of these findings, implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Keywords: User acceptance; adoption; technology acceptance model; social influences; gender differences
Algorithm:

List of Topics

#99 0.327 perceived usefulness acceptance use technology ease model usage tam study beliefs intention user intentions users behavioral perceptions determinants constructs studies
#153 0.225 usage use self-efficacy social factors individual findings influence organizations beliefs individuals support anxiety technology workplace key outcome behavior contextual longitudinal
#218 0.153 role roles gender differences women significant play age men plays sample differ played vary understand critical greater implications relatively offered
#220 0.100 research study different context findings types prior results focused studies empirical examine work previous little knowledge sources implications specifically provide
#127 0.079 systems information research theory implications practice discussed findings field paper practitioners role general important key grounded researchers domain new identified